148
148
Nov 12, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 148
favorite 0
quote 0
secretary, quite honestly is the lack of an overall information technology architecture you and i have talked about this before, and it still doesn't exist today as far as i know. i've pointed that out and my committee has pointed that out and outside they've looked at the va's i.t. department and have pointed that out. i'm just not convinced that five years from now given that i don't know where you will be, but my fear is that we are going to be sitting here talking about the same issue again because we are not going about it with the discipline i come from an information technology career of over 30 years. i worked at u.s. special operations command as the director of the staff i know what it takes to get this stuff done, and five years, gentleman is totally unacceptable. and i don't really have a question for you. i just want you to fix this for crying out loud. >> can i respond? congressmen coming you and i but primarily roger baker and you have had this discussion. i work with you and we believe we have the good mark on architecture and i haven't satisfied you. we will come back
secretary, quite honestly is the lack of an overall information technology architecture you and i have talked about this before, and it still doesn't exist today as far as i know. i've pointed that out and my committee has pointed that out and outside they've looked at the va's i.t. department and have pointed that out. i'm just not convinced that five years from now given that i don't know where you will be, but my fear is that we are going to be sitting here talking about the same issue again...
104
104
Nov 8, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 104
favorite 0
quote 0
summit technology is an na boehler so the use the technology to be successful. wal-mart used technology. we have to have the original idea to begin with and i think one of the things they've done is they empower their people so a trend in san francisco bay don't have to salute the flag and a good to corporate headquarters. i think what we really need to focus on our couple key things. diversifying the economy, we need a robust basis but now we have to diversify. one of the reasons we suffered so greatly is the entire city was tied to one industry and when they ran into trouble the entire region. the second thing about technology is these are companies that are cabbles that can scale quickly. what used to take decades to create a significant amount of jobs can now in a couple of months. so i think it is imperative that the local universities and communities rally behind entrepreneurship because it can make such a big impact so quickly. >> something i talked to both of you about and i feel passionate about because i know you do this, right now and this is incredib
summit technology is an na boehler so the use the technology to be successful. wal-mart used technology. we have to have the original idea to begin with and i think one of the things they've done is they empower their people so a trend in san francisco bay don't have to salute the flag and a good to corporate headquarters. i think what we really need to focus on our couple key things. diversifying the economy, we need a robust basis but now we have to diversify. one of the reasons we suffered...
69
69
Nov 13, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 69
favorite 0
quote 0
and also, what kind of armed forces who have and also the defense technology. so, should we have discussion about this defense strategy? thank you. >> i had a couple thoughts. you say how do we invest in domestic affairs, money we don't have. but depend on the nature of the deal to raise revenues, basically you're saying money are not spending on the pentagon may be available for the purposes of public investment. it really depends on the larger parameters of the budget deal. asser waste in the pentagon, i'm interested whether my colleagues can put a percentage on. i think it's steep and its pervasive but i think it depends on how you define it if you're buying a weapon you don't become is that wasteful? i would suggest if you are certainly smaller kinds of ways in terms of procurement policy and overruns and so forth. but there's got to be a key target. i think we could do a whole panel on alternative strategy but it's clear that nuclear weapons, preparing for counterinsurgency, the kind of made overly optimistic sense of what we can do with the drones and nav
and also, what kind of armed forces who have and also the defense technology. so, should we have discussion about this defense strategy? thank you. >> i had a couple thoughts. you say how do we invest in domestic affairs, money we don't have. but depend on the nature of the deal to raise revenues, basically you're saying money are not spending on the pentagon may be available for the purposes of public investment. it really depends on the larger parameters of the budget deal. asser waste...
94
94
Nov 12, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 94
favorite 0
quote 0
we should the development of new and high technology weapon and equipment. and -- a high caliber personnel in large numbers and we should increase efforts to run the armed forces with the strict [inaudible] and in other nonders with the law to the new level. we should allocate reform of the national defense and armed forces in both active and priewbt way in the military transmore make. we should -- [inaudible] for the innovation in defense -- and. and continue to follow the chinese-style that integrated development of military and civilian sector. we should speed up the butte -- [inaudible] and we should consolidate [inaudible] and the government and military and the civil yap -- civil yabs. national defense policy that different in the nature. [applause] enriching the practice of one country, two system and inconvenient, chinese reunification. since the return to mother land, they embarked a broad road in which they and the mainland descraw on each other and pursue common development with the success of the one country two country principal. the underlying
we should the development of new and high technology weapon and equipment. and -- a high caliber personnel in large numbers and we should increase efforts to run the armed forces with the strict [inaudible] and in other nonders with the law to the new level. we should allocate reform of the national defense and armed forces in both active and priewbt way in the military transmore make. we should -- [inaudible] for the innovation in defense -- and. and continue to follow the chinese-style that...
89
89
Nov 15, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 89
favorite 0
quote 0
says wind is a mature technology. and what have we got after 20 years and billions of dollars of subsidies? a puny amount of unreliable electricity. our country uses nearly 25% of all the electricity in the world. wind produces 3% of that. of course, it only produces it when the wind blows. it's not easy to store it. so it is of limited use in a country that needs huge amounts of low-cost, clean, reliable electricity. relying on wind power is the energy equivalent of going to war in sailboats when nuclear submarines are available. the wind subsidy is so large, mr. president, that wind developers are now paying distributors to take their wind power under cutting the base load energy plants that are necessary to provide the reliable electricity we need for the country. and on top of that, there are better ways to produce clean electricity, better ways than subsidizing a technology that destroys the environment in the name of saving the environment. for example, for the same -- it would take a row of 50 wind turbines fro
says wind is a mature technology. and what have we got after 20 years and billions of dollars of subsidies? a puny amount of unreliable electricity. our country uses nearly 25% of all the electricity in the world. wind produces 3% of that. of course, it only produces it when the wind blows. it's not easy to store it. so it is of limited use in a country that needs huge amounts of low-cost, clean, reliable electricity. relying on wind power is the energy equivalent of going to war in sailboats...
81
81
Nov 9, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
you have people confuse with a very limited amount of technology and infrastructure requirements like the use of cell phones and how do you communicate during these kinds of disasters at the local level to say what your requirements are? how would you leverage those technologies to inform and independent group who is dedicated to supporting those kinds of things? that could be the csis and any non-governmental government to apply a bias or an agenda. as much as the government wants to do what it wants to do, it is there because it cares and it wants to help but everyone on the receiving end is going to be looking at it, what's in it for them? and so i think that we need a way, supposedly government supported so there is, i don't know, i know of a lot of companies that have identified ways to handle logistics and bring logistics into in a very businesslike way. yet we continue to use what we they know because it's there but it's costly and it's costly to the government that supports it. i would like to see us address a uniformly embraced standard process for how you manage and sort thr
you have people confuse with a very limited amount of technology and infrastructure requirements like the use of cell phones and how do you communicate during these kinds of disasters at the local level to say what your requirements are? how would you leverage those technologies to inform and independent group who is dedicated to supporting those kinds of things? that could be the csis and any non-governmental government to apply a bias or an agenda. as much as the government wants to do what...
76
76
Nov 14, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
part of it is technology. that led to a turnout evident that was very pressed on their side in the end makes the difference increase in turnout among the base, democratic party is that two point difference. second, paul, you and i talked about this, i do think as republicans we were not able to take our message, which was the right message in a year when the economy was not doing well and most people were looking for change and take it to the level that people thought it made a difference in their lives for themselves and their families and this something, folks in this room are either nonmart sawn or democrats or republicans but i hope you can all agree there are certain things we should do in our economy that are growth oriented, including tax reform, regulatory relief and energy policies that we were talking about in this campaign but i think we had difficulty independent voters not republican or democrat. there is not turnout issue this is more dealing with independent voters in the middle enable to convin
part of it is technology. that led to a turnout evident that was very pressed on their side in the end makes the difference increase in turnout among the base, democratic party is that two point difference. second, paul, you and i talked about this, i do think as republicans we were not able to take our message, which was the right message in a year when the economy was not doing well and most people were looking for change and take it to the level that people thought it made a difference in...
121
121
Nov 14, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 121
favorite 0
quote 1
the technology included the so-called system some of you have maybe read about in the last couple of days which was the republican get-out-the-vote technology to ensure people are getting to the polls. i'm told on election day it had so many hits around the country as it should have from people saying this person voted and this person didn't. but if that was under attack it closed down. so for those of you hear from again that technology field to enter some politics, we republicans want to talk to you. [laughter] we need some help. the democratic system was quite effective at micro targeting and i've heard lots of anecdotes and one this morning that you will love that somebody gets a call that's a democrat from law school and was we see that you voted and disinformation is publicly available. was it you that voted 2:00 on election day but your sister hasn't. can you call her. that's the level at that point. that led to a turnout effort that in the end makes the difference. the increase in turnout among the base democratic party is a two-point difference. i do think that as republican
the technology included the so-called system some of you have maybe read about in the last couple of days which was the republican get-out-the-vote technology to ensure people are getting to the polls. i'm told on election day it had so many hits around the country as it should have from people saying this person voted and this person didn't. but if that was under attack it closed down. so for those of you hear from again that technology field to enter some politics, we republicans want to talk...
71
71
Nov 16, 2012
11/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 71
favorite 0
quote 0
we were able to test new technology, underwater vehicles and neutralizing mines and we brought an international coalition together. we hoped to get about 20 countries here with 35 countries to take part in this exercise. 20 of them brought ships or helicopters or the means. we had a staging base that we used before if you will the flagship, the command ship for the coalition operations and so, we learned a great deal. we learned that there is a lot of synergy that we can bring together and we knew that unmanned underwater vehicles to work on the countermining and that you don't need a countermeasure ships and a large helicopter dragging this led to clear these things out to be effective but in fact smaller ships that some nations with smaller navies bring to bear on this and become very, very effective participants in the mission. >> we are almost out of time but before we get to the last question i have a couple of housekeeping matters to take care of. first of all i would like to remind you about our upcoming lunch speakers on december 18th. leon panetta the secretary of the u.s. to put the d
we were able to test new technology, underwater vehicles and neutralizing mines and we brought an international coalition together. we hoped to get about 20 countries here with 35 countries to take part in this exercise. 20 of them brought ships or helicopters or the means. we had a staging base that we used before if you will the flagship, the command ship for the coalition operations and so, we learned a great deal. we learned that there is a lot of synergy that we can bring together and we...